How a reasonable person could ever convince themselves that acting as a piece of talking airfreight is loggable experience for licensing purposes is beyond me.
To suggest that the regulatory authorities should be pinning down the definition of "flight time" in this context to such an extent is simply farcical.
And if they tried they'd likely screw it up, anyway.
I couldn't believe that either, that anyone would consider claiming pax time in CAT could possibly have any bearing on their "Flight Time" required under the 12 hour/2nd year rule.