Comment from the Moderators?
C-Steve
I think you raise a fundamental question about this forum. Is it a "pilots only" forum? I don't see that in the term "Rotorheads" but maybe others do. Yes it is Professional Pilots Rumour Network as pointed out by Helilog56, but if it is exclusively for PILOTS, then why are there threads for so many other non-pilot aspects of aviation? Maybe the structure of the threads should be reviewed so that rotary pilots can have their own thread where they can slag off at each aircraft type to their heart's content while there is a second thread where the technical aspects that actually may save lives can be discussed.
The ONLY reason I post mainly on "Rotorheads" is that I am a specialist in adhesive bond failure forensics and helicopters are a classic example of structures which absolutely depend on adhesive bonds for flight safety of principal structural elements. I am only here because I strongly believe I have unique expertise which can help advance flight safety (yes, I am talking to EASA and FAA directly).
Note that while I have some concerns about some types of helicopter I do not join in the Robbo (or any other specific manufacturer) bashing because in my experience there are issues with many bonded structures on rotary and fixed wing aircraft irrespective of the manufacturer. The difference is that for fixed-wing bonded structures the items are usually not principal structural elements. I do not usually comment on issues which do not relate to adhesive bonding. (The occasional comment on the humour page excepted.)
I think the opinions on this page (especially as it relates to the technical aspects of blade ADs,) should not be restricted to flight crew only. Mods any comment?
Blakmax