We can already surmise a lot from the lack of reaction from Airbus who already know all there is to know of the DFDR/CVR recordings. There have been no urgent ADs issued by Airbus as one would expect if something had 'failed'. So we know that in Airbus' view the aircraft worked as expected.
They must conclude that an AD would not prevent recurrence of the event. Which would be the case if for instance the human / computer interface needs "refinement".
I do wonder what is occurring at Airbus right now. They must be quite frantic.
"You can never make the same mistake twice; because the second time you make it, it's not a mistake, it's a choice."