Originally Posted by vilas
First the rejection of the third is no different than ADR3 fault should have come on ECAM
Airbus thinks otherwise and wants to keep the 'magic' as long as possible and so without noticing the crew of the real situation ...
One thing which I did not understand is why did the aircraft go in direct law.
"The aeroplane's high angle of attack and the roll movements generated asymmetry, and a speed variation between ADR 1 and 2 appeared. This increasing divergence caused a rejection of the three ADRs by the FAC then the ELAC".
As that 320 was in landing configuration, the flight control system passed straight to direct law.