Blame the crew for not doing the test above 10000ft and not recalling the characteristic speeds during the briefing, but not for not applying a procedure they didn't have.
In the meantime I do maintain that ISATM procedure is erroneous as there is no way to read the data for AOA #3
Originally Posted by vilas
But you won't prove a point to Conf.
Conf wouldn't keep his job much longer if he was not following the procedures.
The system knew something was wrong with the data, all it needed was to advise the crew by a straightforward ECAM MSG :
NAV AOA DISAGREE
As Airbus gave so much priority to the AOA data in its system, it would be logical to at least advise a crew when one single reading differs from the 2 others.