It is important to remember that the phrase "justice system" is simply a marketing tool used by the legal industry in various countries to make the public believe the legal industry is about "justice".
It is not, it is about winning and losing money either through judgements or legal bills.
No matter how much logic ordinary people attempt to apply to the legal industries, there will be some case, some set of facts that belie that logic.
Naturally the case brings up the obvious question which is, if an employer is subject to a standard of care with respect to inquiring about the aircraft, its' history of maintenance, its' performance capabilities and the like; And if the employer is also subject to a standard of care with respect to the pilots training, history, past performance and the like, what is the purpose of Regulators, Regulatory Authority and the myriad of arcane regulations?
More importantly, since fault was found by this court, why are the regulators not also responsible and paying, if this is actually about justice and laying fair fault?