Originally Posted by NoD
Posts above appear to disagree with that? I appreciate you appear to have a grudge against Airbus and it's products, but does it really extend to accusing Airbus of writing Test Schedules asking the impossible.
Exact same reply stands :
The crew has rushed and was clearly poorly prepared, but how would you want them to check those 3 AOA values when only 2 are available and so only indirectly through the third MCDU ... ?
But what about you actually link the document you mention ... ?
To have an AoA problem such as Perpignan, ignore the signs there was such an issue, and then require a Max Perf GPWS warning I consider "improbable".
As improbable as 2 AOA vanes would lie together to trigger a protection that a crew could do nothing about it ... except by shutting down some computers ... or how to have to publish an improbable red OEB.