Anyway, back to the subject - I think the thing that annoys me most with this 'expert' bizzo is that anyone who's happy for themselves to be tagged as 'Biggles' in an article should, in my world of right and wrong, be an experienced pilot; apparently not the case with old mate, although perhaps it's appropriate as Biggles was fictional...
Yes, back on topic gentlemen.
And on to the important matter, Biggles...
I can see your point regarding the title of "Biggles" and the appropriateness of its usage on a layperson.
The burning question is how appropriate is it to bestow such a title as "Biggles" on one who has NOT completed the necessary licenses and qualifications?
At what point does one earn the right to be called "Biggles". Should it be a minimum CPL standard or higher? Is it possible to bestow the 'honorary' title of "Biggles" on someone who has not the necessary licenses and qualifications, but who has made a significant contribution to aviation?
These gentlemen, are the big questions.
The important questions.