Raise the bar
We bemoan an erosion in skill on the flight deck of automated aircraft. We bemoan an erosion in terms and conditions because of oversupply.
Where is the indignation at the laughably easy theoretical study? The multiple guess exams that aren't even negatively marked? Tens of thousands for type ratings that excessively summarise the requisite knowledge of the aircraft?
The knowledge requirements are clearly laid out and courses focus on passing exams. There's no in depth discussion on operational problems you'll face on a daily basis. There's no real impetus to impart lasting knowledge, just enough to pass the exams. An FTOs reputation is based purely on its ability to get bums on seats in a LoCo.
We cry foul that ATPL theoretical studies aren't treated as an equal to a degree; why should they be? Raise the bar. Inspect FTOs for quality. Ensure the FTOs set appropriate entry requirements to avoid fleecing those who will struggle, just as universities are required to do.
No one is perfect, we're all learning. Let's drive the knowledge base of the industry up and make the barriers to entry skill and knowledge based rather than financial.