PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - UH-72 to Rucker ? What's the Army thinking?
Old 9th December 2014 | 16:51
  #63 (permalink)  
Lonewolf_50
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Aug 2009
: Military
Posts: 9,336
Likes: 2,184
From: Texas
Originally Posted by mixing lever
Another factor is the abysmal level of maintenance that civilian contractors at Rucker have always had. "Why do today what you can put off until tomorrow?" should be the mission statement for the civilian workforce.
The availability will be very poor, on a good day.
Dear Sir:

Your generalized statement cannot go unchallenged.
When I was on active duty, I got to see some of the contract maintenance at work.
Some was pretty good, some not so much.
As BB says, how good it is has two prime factors:
1. How well the contract was written
2. How effective the oversight is
a third factor is
3. How the funding lines on the contract and on parts were integrated into the overall support plan. Again, that varied depending upon which operation I saw and got to be supported (or badly supported) by.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Reply