VH NGA
with thanks to SARCS
Mr Dolan: No. It was significant, but in the assessment of the ATSB it was not new.
....................................
Mr Dolan: I do not think I said it was significant. I did say it was new.
This, to my simple mind sums up the raison d'etre of the senate inquiry;
When you cannot rely upon what you are being told.....and yet these sentences were about the same subject (CHambers report) and related within seconds of each other?
But why was it all necessary - what was the aim - what did it achieve?
If lies follow lies? Was the Chambers report significant or new or neither?
with thanx also to NX - if he ever needs a vote?