PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - "Pilotless airliners safer" - London Times article
Old 2nd Dec 2014, 00:12
  #63 (permalink)  
WingNut60
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Perth, WESTERN AUSTRALIA
Age: 71
Posts: 889
Received 19 Likes on 12 Posts
Cat 6050 - oops RH200

You have a point, but not a very good one.
The only doubt here is WHEN!
If not now, then sooner or later .....


You are correct in saying that introducing immature technology would be a disaster.
But the technology is maturing (refer drones) and will, eventually get there.


And undoubtedly, somewhere down the track, the first pilotless aircraft will come to a sticky end.
But that is unlikely to spell the end of pilotless aircraft.
A banner headline saying "pilotless aircraft flies into seawall at SFO" is no more likely to stop people flying than one that says "piloted aircraft flies into seawall at SFO"


I am not arguing the pros and cons - just stating the obvious / inevitable.


As for autonomous trucks "barely working" then I think you would get an argument from Komatsu / Rio / CRA about that.
"... to date, 19 autonomous haul trucks (AHT's) have moved 100 million tonnes of rock in the Pilbara region of Western Australia"


If not now... then when!
WingNut60 is online now