I don't think there can be any genuine professionals or even knowledgeable laymen out there who really think that they are better placed to judged the course of action taken than the operating crew in this incident.
The fact that that this whole thread stems from a Daily Mail article in which they take their 'facts' from an over-dramatic baggage chucker who can smell a paycheck rather than anyone with an iota of professional knowledge says it all. The trouble with 'Dan' and many like him is that he is so stupid, he doesn't realise quite how stupid he is. His opinion and speculation is absoulutely worthless, yet the Mail present it as the testimony of an expert witness. Drivel.
