PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - More KC-46A woes....
View Single Post
Old 10th Nov 2014, 13:25
  #127 (permalink)  
KenV
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
then why not buy more freighters? tha damn thing is supposed to be a TANKER, not a glorified DC-8F
Really? On what is this assertion based? Look at the USAF designations. They are KC-45 and KC-46. The C stands for cargo. Yup, these are multi-mission aircaft which include not only tanker and freight missions, but also passenger and medevac missions, along with a few more.

And about that airbus MRTT designation? The MR stands for Multi-Role and the TT stands for Tanker Transport. Once again, a multi-mission aircraft.

Given the missions USAF wants to execute with their aircraft, the KC-46 met those mission needs better.

Given the missions RAF wants to execute with thier aircraft, the A330 met those mission needs better.
KenV is offline