Blantoon, a couple of serious serious questions, noting your angle on several threads
Can you not see any negative points to employing a disproportionate percentage of debted new hires?
Thinking with a bigger picture in mind (as a pose to from inside a me-me-me bubble) do you think employing a disproportionate percentage of debted new hires adversely affects terms/conditions for all, potentially industry wide whilst also creating a two tier industry that penalises experience?
All things considered, is it healthy for anybody - other than management and the shareholders of the "large fto" - to have so many debted new hires gushing into the bottom of the career pyramid when there are both experienced guys available, and guys with more experience/substantially less debt from differing training backgrounds that actually tend to perform no differently on type and line training?