PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Merged: Senate Inquiry
View Single Post
Old 26th Oct 2014, 22:17
  #2375 (permalink)  
Sarcs
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Go west young man
Posts: 1,733
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Obfuscation & the public interest pendulum.

Ms Staib's performance in last week's Estimates: The strange mixed & inconsistent message from MS between one potential case of credit card fraud (in the courts) & another (up to 20k) abuse of credit card (dismissal)....was certainly quite bizarre.. But what I found most disturbing was the (almost dismissive) attitude of MS when questioned on the spending of literally 10s of millions of (96 of them) public funded monies by ASA...


Although that only calls into question Ms Staib's performance & suitability for her position as CEO of ASA - because ASA are only really applying due process for the funds once pax numbers pass a certain threshold (i.e. 350k) for upgrading fire fighting services at an airport.

My question is that in terms of 'in the public interest' is the ASA CEO ineptitude & incompetence - on display at Estimates - any worse than Beaker's aiding & abetting the CAsA attempted cover-up of PelAir?? In particular the Beaker decision not to spend the extra taxpayer funds required to recover VH-NGA & it's blackbox - after all they did have the bloody thing roped off...


Beaker - MH370 search perfect muppet for the job??
Kharon - At least the MH 370 investigation has the right man at the helm; can't have Houston he is not so obliging when it comes to the cover up of the duck up, whereas Beaker has had all the practice he'll ever need and necessary experience in estimates questioning to deflect, delay and dilute the 'factual' content.
Interesting point you make "K"...

Came across an article from IBT (International Business Times) which would give credence to your summation:
MH370 Search Update: Expert Highlights Cover Up Of Malaysia And Australia In Withholding Plane’s Recordings

By Athena Yenko| October 26, 2014 1:32 AM EST

The first four hours into the disappearance of the missing Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 was crucial to the investigation. What transpired during this critical period were surely documented by different audio recording contained in recorders and hard disks that up until now are not being released in public and being withheld from the families of the passengers. Neither Malaysia nor Australia is releasing such recordings and hard disks; therefore, these two nations could be guilty of a cover up for something that remains convoluted and unknown today, an aviation expert alleged.


.ads_rectangle_img_content_left {background-color: #FFFFFF;font-size: 1px;line-height: 1px;margin: 0;padding: 0;}#content #left_tool{width:300px !important;}#content #left_tool_1{display: inline;float: left;margin-right: 15px;width:180px !important;}Des Ross, a pilot and air traffic management specialist with more than 35 years in aviation industry, wants to know "what secret was there and what were" Malaysia and Australia "so protective about." An aviation advisor in South Sudan, he wants to understand "what needed to be kept secret from the world even when 239 people were lost?"

Ross highlighted the very known and given fact that Malaysian Air Force has the capacity to intercept an unidentified aircraft; that it could instruct its military pilot to track a plane that its radar found to be flying out to the Andaman Sea. But it had chosen and is continuing to withhold the information.


"What is the secret they were guarding? Why is there still no information in the public domain about what happened that night during the first four hours?" Ross asked. He highlighted that answers to these questions are contained somewhere but are being hidden.

He said the pilot/air traffic controller recording contains the answers to his questions. A separate recording of the voice coordination between the air traffic controllers in Kuala Lumpur and Ho Chi Minh City - done via a voice/ data link and kept for 30 days - has the information. A recorded communications between military air defence officer and the civil air traffic controller in Kuala Lumpur control centre also holds information - assuming that they talked with each other in tracking the "unidentified" plane; if they did not, then they commit criminal negligence. Moreover, all telephone conversations between military centre and the civil ATC centre are recorded.

"Nobody can tell us that the recordings do not exist." Ross argued. Malaysia and Australia "could be accused of covering up vital information which would help the families and independent investigators to work out what happened," he upheld.
Meanwhile, Transport Ministry Secretary-General Datuk Ruhaizah Mohamed Rashid said that Indonesia has yet to report of any spotted debris from MH370.

Any time that debris turns up in Indonesia, it will be brought to Australia for analysis. Australian authorities will then send its report to Boeing for verification, Rashid told a press briefing conducted by Joint Agency Coordination Centre (JACC) chief coordinator Judith Zielke and Australian Transport Safety Bureau spokesman Peter Forley.

To contact the editor, e-mail: [email protected]

{Comment: Des Ross also published in ABAP online - Expert challenges MH370 story}.

Mr Ross certainly raises some questions that test the veracity & credibility of the Malaysian (& by association ATsB) assumptions for basing their search for MH370 in the Southern Indian Ocean...

Moral of the story: If indeed the whole search mission does go sour (i.e. cock-up) and needs to be stonewalled - always pick a muppet with no cred over an Air Marshal (retired or active) every time...

MTF...
Sarcs is offline