PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - AF 447 Thread No. 12
View Single Post
Old 26th Oct 2014, 21:52
  #728 (permalink)  
_Phoenix_
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Montreal
Age: 53
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Clandestino
While precise and correct answer could be provided only by Airbus FBW experts - and I strongly suspect any of them reading AF447 threads must be howling with laughter
I only agree with first sentence

It's nothing to laugh about, but answers must be drawn

Hé ! qu'est-ce qu'il fait !? here
Ja it's pitching up all the time!!!
But what is happening? here

waaay too much even for the most corruptostupid aerogovernmental people inhabiting the imagination of PPRuNe's resident Airbus bashers
...be careful not to sprain your tongue

Originally Posted by Owain Glyndwr
... in alternate this THS movement inhibition could be triggered by stall warning rather than alpha protection. Only AOA data involved there, no false airspeeds; and I can see no good reason to trim into a stall situation.
Yes, it make sense. For all laws, THS function must include AOA. It's inadmissible THS's roll back under stall warning and AOA over 40deg.
THS position instrument and AOA indicator must be part of any cockpit instrumentation, with improved awareness for extreme positions.
_Phoenix_ is offline