Originally Posted by
jcjeant
At at least 60 knots forward airspeed we can suppose that a A330 (if in the air) is stalled (or no more what is called "flying")
Can we agree on this ?
If all the sensors are functioning normally, sure - but you have to design for the possibility that they won't be. Prior to this accident, an apparent IAS of less than 60kts would likely have been considered far more likely to be a sensor failure than an actual occurrence (as tdracer alludes to above). So, no, can't necessarily agree.
Originally Posted by
CONF iture
he possibly lost trust in the FCS integrity so asked Dubois to switch off or reset some FCCs.
Aside from the fact that there's nothing to suggest this in the slightest on the CVR.
The majority of the contents of the "Red OEB" you say should have been published in your linked post were already covered in the UAS procedure included as part of the report (Annexe 06):
http://www.bea.aero/docspa/2009/f-cp...nexe.06.en.pdf
What difference would the OEB have made (
AFAIK a "Red" OEB would have required an AD - something which AF would probably have pushed back on)?