"bonds were virtually unenforceable." & "Usually a breach of contract by either party allows the other to persue for damages"
There is of course 2 sides to every story!
As I said earlier I am not interested in outing the company or any names, so we will leave it at that.
Just a few points, breach of contract or invalid contract due to unreasonable terms, or misrepresentation by the airlines of the work relation, makes this a minefield for the airline to enter into!
As I have mentioned earlier, what is the reason the airlines do not take legal action?
If they win they win the case, problem solved!
It does seem more like private parking companies, trying to enforce a penalty for parking on private land! Not enforceable, because it is not legal! They can only claim for factual cost, if 1 Euro per hour, they can only claim this in the court!
So it seems by some, that primitive bullying, and personal threats is the right way an employee should be treated, instead of proper legal action, where both sides are able to defend themselves properly.
So why not just let companies do as they like, and ignore the laws that govern them, and ignore the legal rights of people, as many of you believe this is the right way.
The crux of the matter, is that there is a reason it is unforceable, and that the companies will loose if they take this to court! But it seems like some prefer to ignore this little unknown fact!