PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - DEBUNKING SILLY LIFT THEORIES
View Single Post
Old 25th September 2014 | 16:34
  #20 (permalink)  
SpannerInTheWerks
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 459
Likes: 1
From: Philippines
{Lifting airfoils are designed to have the upper surface longer than the bottom.} This is not always correct. The symmetric airfoil in our experiment generates plenty of lift and its upper surface is the same length as the lower surface. Think of a paper airplane. Its airfoil is a flat plate --> top and bottom exactly the same length and shape and yet they fly just fine.
At last.

I remember as a 10 year old boy reading the theory of lift in textbooks and not believing a word of it - for the very reason mentioned above.

All through my life I have stuck to the published theories and spouted them verbatim - still not believing a word of it.

As an aeromodeller - how did my simple glider with a flat plate section create lift, how did my aerobatic model with a fully symmetrical section fly?

Air cadet - the same.

Then as a pilot passing all my exams (with 100% - but not believing the theory to be the truth!)

Now, at last the mystery is resolved.

Nice to have a scientific answer at last.

... now haven't the 'scientists' 'proved' a bumblebee can't fly ... ?
SpannerInTheWerks is offline  
Reply