Hello Brian Dixon. Thanks for the reply. Yes, I'm afraid we have been down this road very many times. As to the HofL debate, there were two or three very good speeches on both sides, but the most convincing ones favoured the CFIT verdict. And no-one in the debate could explain how a technical fault (and you will recall that no fewer than nine had been suggested and discounted at various stages of this long-running saga) might have led to the crash.
I happen to believe very firmly that it was a CFIT, but I know you will never be convinced. Perhaps the subject is best left as it is.
