TC - actually I have been listening and I agree with much of what you say. However you please listen and understand why I am saying - and that's that people, as you are here - tend to generalise and not look at the exact cause of an accident. I stand by my comments. Why do you think he hit that crane? Do you agree with my analysis? If not, where is it flawed? Or do you really think he was just randomly in and out of cloud and could have hit various buildings at odd times?
Don't think that I am trying to say Pete wasn't to blame. He was. But looking at detail is interesting. If he had not hit that crane he would have almost certainly landed at Battersea with no problem and the flight would have attracted no attention.