Mr Marnet-Cornus seemed to write again in a story telling what has been investigated and discussed, medias included.
He wrote that as a tribute to pilots' honor. But their survival would have saved their honor too.
Mr Marnet-Cornus seems to have misread our PPRuNe's threads :
- He seems to have missed what our specialist gums wrote about the inertial HUD and our following exchanges.
Why did French regulators, Air France heads, and important pilots' Unions like SNPL, UNAC, SNPNAC, SPIT, and younger Unions reject or at least forget the Klopfstein's HUD design ? (I have my idea ).
- He seems to have accepted that ACARS claim to be private informations , perhaps with Copyright, not to be used by pilots, Justice, investigations*, and pilots' feedback in training.
Not a word about HUD or not ECAM reported ACARS which should have saved the flight.
That report points other interesting questions but I feel it as partial. Dozy points the SNPL behind that report, but nothing shows that it is a SNPL report, it is Mr Marnet-Cornus' report.
*But the BEA did not follow that denegation
