PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Windfarms
Thread: Windfarms
View Single Post
Old 4th Sep 2014, 00:28
  #174 (permalink)  
Up-into-the-air
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: More than 300km from SY, Australia
Posts: 817
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Accounting for CO2 production in Australia

My understanding has always been that Australia has taken "CO2" in coal production by us in calculating total C production as a "world production" basis. A bit hard to find the actual reference, as the greenies have been hiding this material and it is likely the real "ramp up" of totals.

The only reference I have found is:


Cumulative historical contribution

The World Resources Institute estimates that Australia was responsible for 1.1% of all CO2 emissions between 1850 and 2002.[2] Australia has a correspondingly tiny share of the global population, roughly a third of a percent as of 2013.

Projected contribution


According to the no-mitigation scenario in the Garnaut Climate Change Review, Australia's share of world emissions, at 1.5% in 2005, declines to 1.1% by 2030, and to 1% by 2100.[3]

Confounding factors


The import and export of goods confounds equitable measurements of emissions, particularly in the context of endeavouring to reach a global agreement on emissions reduction based on contraction and convergence. Australian emissions are monitored on a production rather than a consumption basis. This means that the emissions from the manufacture of goods imported into and consumed within Australia, for example many motor vehicles, are allocated to the country of manufacture. Similarly, Australia produces aluminium for export which requires substantial amounts of electricity which is produced by greenhouse gas emitting coal-fired power stations. While the aluminium is mainly consumed overseas, the emissions of its production are allocated to Australia. Geoff Carmody argues we need a consumption based emissions trading scheme.[4]

Indirect contribution


Australia is a major exporter of coal, particularly from Newcastle, Australia.[5] The coal is produced from coal mining in Australia. The greenhouse gas emissions in other countries from the proposed increase in coal export capacity of the major Australian ports will greatly outweigh the proposed reductions in Australia's emissions from the introduction of the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme. While Australia imposes safeguards on the export of uranium, it does not impose any requirements for carbon capture and storage of greenhouse gas emissions of exported coal. Australia thus contributes substantially more to the global warming which, according to the Garnaut Climate Change Review will lead to the destruction of the Great Barrier Reef, Kakadu and the Murray Darling Basin as they have existed during recorded history to date.
Australia is also a major exporter of liquefied natural gas, another fossil fuel.[6]
However, this is an aviation forum and I believe the issues are:

  1. Has casa properly protected us from the wind turbines?;
  2. Do the wind turbines affect aviation?;
  3. What is the proper distance from an airport;
  4. What protection is being made for the future?;
  5. Is casa being consulted by approving organisations for proper effects on aviation?;
  6. Are the proposers using proper and correct information from aviation savvy people?;
  7. Has CAAct 9A been breached by casa in respect of approvals of wind turbine farms??
  8. How does the movement [without approval] by 385metres in the Crookwell area, affect the actual approval and aviation? and
  9. Was this confirmed [post final approval] OR
  10. Does the constructing company and the approving organisation breach CAAct 9A?
Only thinking.
Up-into-the-air is offline