OZ, I'm all for risk assessment. I know what I was like at 250 hours
A fresh CPL at 250 hours, working for a flying organisation has the benefit of guidance from a Chief Pilot. A 250 hour pilot conducting an angel flight has the benefit of guidance from who?
If Angel Flight has excluded experimental aircraft from their operations they are obviously conducting risk assessment (and good on them). Surely it doesn't hurt to be proactive and talk to CAsA and nut out a responsible solution?