evidence, show me the evidence
In all of this, given that the Prince of Postnominals had his trousers pulled down when his "new international research on CVD" turned out to be his old mate Dougal's need to publish something that had nothing to do with the safety consequences of CVD, has anyone come up with any evidence, real peer-reviewed evidence, that might in any way upset the evidence considered so carefully in Denison?
Anything at all?