Ah yes Rarely,
I recall a line in the book '101 Nights' by Ray Ollis. A pompous career sqn ldr says to F/S navigator, something about the amount of flying. The nav, who has a BEM for gallantry, replies: 'Sir, it's not how many hours you've got but what you've got in to the hours'.
Returning to the post above and TTH's comments about officers who have been court martialled but not discharged, perhaps a medal based on 'good conduct', rather than exclusively service, needs to differentiate between disciplinary action for a 'technical offence' and something which calls the officer's honesty/integrity to be questioned. Thus Flt Lt Buggins is guilty of - say - a low flying offence. However, Flt Lt Snooks makes inaccurate claims for boarding school allowance. The former says a lot about Buggins maturity but Snooks honour is shot to ribbons. Snooks would not get the medal but Buggins probably would. Someone will mention 'rehabilitation of offenders' but part of t he punishment with which Snooks must live in the service is not getting the gong. Hence, my personal preference is for a service medal and not a good conduct medal. This avoids the argument about arbitrating in individual cases.
Old Duffer