People in Victoria may like to know such accreditation appears worthless in regard to aerial medevac insurance for accident victims. If CAsA are not up to regulate properly and competently, then I'm sure The Guardian or The Age would do their usual take on journalistic excellence to safeguard the population if it gave them a shot at an NLP Transport Minister.
Third party insurance should be a given for all pax, not a point of legal debate depending on the political or financial merit of The now apparent Nominal Defendant/ and whether he/she is subject to the first or second accident of the day when claiming compensation. Is he covered for the car crash, but not the plane crash? Hang on... did he already had that head injury!
The Minister for Finance should be forced to pay an Act of Grace payment to those who continue to suffer from both hurt and without compensation from the ditching and recoup that from the CAsA trough or bonuses to report writers. There is prima faci evidence of at least a perceived miscarriage of justice. "The "buck" stops somewhere.
"safe skies for everybody" ?
If they were safe, we wouldn't need insurance. (for what that's worth).
Last edited by Frank Arouet; 1st Aug 2014 at 03:31.
Reason: I feel a new thread coming on.