PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - EC155 incident, SNS, 6 Nov 2013
View Single Post
Old 21st Jul 2014, 16:04
  #121 (permalink)  
JohnDixson
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hobe Sound, Florida
Posts: 950
Received 33 Likes on 27 Posts
Tactile Cueing

212, your note reminded of some personal non-success in this area:

You all might recall that Stewart-Hughes got together with the Westland Lynx people, and installed a system for evaluation which, as I recall their brief to SA sounded awfully like the Bell new system. This was when the S-92 was in the design stage. In fact, Stewart-Hughes was proposing what they called carefree handling, and essentially used flight envelope/blade stall algorithms based upon flight test data, tp command appropriate stick forces etc etc. Our project pilot ( Bob Spaulding ) and I lobbied very hard to include that in the S-92 basic flight controls. Unfortunately, it was way ahead of the technical/business criteria for that design, and a good idea went down the tube.

Tactile cueing remains a very valid, and especially with re to FBW, a really intelligent tool to use in keeping the machine where it is intended to be, both by the pilot accomplishing his mission tasks, and the operator/OEM Mfgr, keeping the machine within the design envelope, and within the envelope upon which the component replacement times have been established.

Thanks for the mental push.

John

Last edited by JohnDixson; 21st Jul 2014 at 16:06. Reason: grammar?
JohnDixson is offline