Jolly well done all 3 award winners.
However, and at the risk of subverting the thread, it has always troubled me that something called "Safety Awards" gets given to people who dealt with genuine emergencies. It does strike me that CAA should either award the "safety awards" to people who have done a great deal to prevent such accidents and incidents happening in the first place, or rename them the "good show awards", or some other name more appropriate to congratulatiing people like these who have done a very good job of handling a very real emergency.
Better still have two sets of awards and recognise people who made both types of safety contribution. Mind you looking at the names on the shortlist, at-least one of them would probably qualify for a gong on both counts.
G