004wercras. May I intervene to "rescue" this thread from immersion in the troll pool (406 with GPS in hand);
In the past 25 years the case for the CVD pilot has been made.
CAsA are in error attacking this proof -"WHICH IS IN". Providing further "opinion" to alter the known scientific conclusion is simply a pathetic mischief and a vexatious act. It is the act of a desperate animal in its death throes.
By the same margin of time, CAsA cannot quantify how many "tragedy's" have been prevented by their intervention with reprehensible strict liability offences and "opinions". They can highlight the known "incidents" which had tragic consequences, however, as there is no such thing as an "accident" any more, they can only claim their prosecutions or wins in the AAT are quantifiable evidence of a perverted prevention.
I'm happy to be roved wrong if anyone can quantify how many lives have been saved by CAsA since 1989. Until this proof is conclusive we have "un-affordable" and nebulous safety.