, is it because illegality in the past is still unrighted wrong today?
And is not the role of a SI team or inquiry.
But their best demonstrably isn't good enough if they don't understand and accept history.
And is not the role of an SI which is to find out what happened during a particular incident. They have, they have made the recommendations based on what happened during a particular incident.
Not sure who made this accusation
Well the usual suspects on here and yet again in one of the most recent posts:
SIs will continue to be nobbled. That is the bitter truth, unpalatable though it be.
Which is, of course, utter pish.
Someone, many years ago, decided that the emerging technology of CWS was not required on the Tornado, or
they decided that something else was more important and given only a
finite pot of money that was this year's priority. So Tornado might have got a new DAS or a new weapon or better GPS because the reality is there is only so much money and other systems, at that point in time, were deemed to be more important.
Why not get together, build a case, formally complain to the police, or the serious crime agency, or to Defence Internal Audit. Write a book, go to the press, make a film, but stop criticizing others who are doing their best,
within their terms of reference, to investigate the circumstances surrounding an incident and most certainly have not been "nobbled" (hamstrung maybe).