PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Future Carrier (Including Costs)
View Single Post
Old 5th Jul 2014, 08:02
  #3511 (permalink)  
Heathrow Harry
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah a CVN is bigger and better but we get two conventional carriers for the price of one "Gerald Ford"

Given that there has been NO carrier -to-carrier battles in the last 69 years you can argue (and people even in the USA do) that a CVN is a very expensive, and very man-power heavy, way of putting lots of eggs in a small number of baskets

If the CVA's are properly equipped they can carry enough strike aircraft and helicopters for what we need

As we aren't planning to going head-to head with the PLA (N) the new UK carriers are a good (but expensive) fit for our purposes
Heathrow Harry is offline