Originally Posted by cxorcist
It's all about the wing.
You were the dipstick that said it was under powered !!!!
The numbers show the A350-1000 has a higher T/W ratio than the 77X (6% higher), 787-8 (13% higher), 787-9 (12% higher), and 787-10 (5% higher), and 747-8i (5% higher).
and now you are saying it is all in the wing after being clearly shown you were WRONG ?????????
The 77W does not have the same wing as the 772/773, however when Airbus does something to increase the wing area by a similar amount it is an automatic failure ????
Nothing you say follows any logic. You were caught out spinning more crap, so you spin some more.
Originally Posted by cxorcist
Notice how the 787 wing will fly successfully on three aircraft
It is not the same wing (side-of-body wing join and internal structure), and only two different MTOWs. It was also not the same wing as the 787-3.
Originally Posted by cxorcist
Save your propoganda for the uninformed.
Good mantra for you to say to yourself each day mirror man ?
Which aircraft is under powered ? or do you think for a second they might all have enough thrust to be certified ?