I have followed this thread with some interest, and I've noticed, as Paul said above, that it's populated by two distinctly different groups. Those who have a coherent argument, and those whose posts are somewhat emotional and irrational.
Oxford Air Training School is a commercial establishment. It exists to make money. It is not a charity for would-be airline pilots. It makes money both from those it trains and those who buy its products. It has, in general, a good reputation with both and it will seek to continue that. It will not do so by peddling dodgy products which are perceived as useless to the airline community.
To achieve that while not excluding those who are determined to get an ATPL whatever their ability, Oxford has chosen to offer an aptitude-tested deluxe course for those it is most confident will be good recruits into the airlines. If the course works, both the airlines and the students will be happy, and Oxford will make a profit.
I don't see any way in which this course will disadvantage those who choose not to do it, and there are still plenty of other ways of getting your ATPL without spending this kind of money - assuming that it does finally cost the student the £65k quoted. Oxford's 18 graduates per course are not going to flood the market.
The bottom line, ladies and gentlemen, as that the best people will, in general, be the most successful in the job market. If you have little aptitude but lots of money and determination you may well achieve an ATPL, but don't expect me to employ and fly with you! There is no God-given right to a flying career and, as Paul says, many would-be pilots would be better employed in another field. It's harsh but true, peeps, and you just have to accept it.