PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - The most unnecessary chute pull ever?
View Single Post
Old 22nd May 2014, 17:31
  #362 (permalink)  
Mach Jump
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 1,113
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Ps. I also think that aircraft should be certified to operate, without limitations or modifications, both with, and without the system being operational.
...which couldn't be removed without making significant design changes...
I wasn't considering complete removal of the system, only flying with the system inoperative.

...but they both agreed with Cirrus that using the parachute was a better way to recover from a spin with minimum loss of height - 920ft lost in a 1 turn spin with a parachute recovery, and typically between 1,200-1,800ft lost in a 1 turn spin with a normal aerodynamic recovery.
This comparison would only stand up if the end result of a 'chute pull' was the same as a successful aerodynamic recovery, which it clearly isn't.

It seems to me that a compromise has been made here.


MJ

Last edited by Mach Jump; 22nd May 2014 at 17:56. Reason: Spelling
Mach Jump is offline