That has got to be the funniest thing I've read all year!
Ridiculous? Yes. But it is still demonstrably true. Funny? No. Tragic more like.
Just ask who submitted the flight safety related evidence to various Coroners and Inquiries, who unanimously rejected MoD's version. Ask who Lord Philip had to approach to obtain MoD JSPs, Def Stans, reports etc because MoD couldn't find them or denied their existence. AP3207 for example. Ask why MoD couldn't even provide evidence of the Release to Service procedures. When the Chinook Mk2 RTS was provided to him independently, Lord Philip rejected MoD's claims that there was no such thing in 1993/4. When the CHART report was provided independently, it disproved VSOs' claims that it did not refer to Chinook Mk2. When the complete CHART report was provided independently, it contained 348 more pages than MoD claimed existed.
Read the last few pages on this thread. If you get the definition of Functional Safety wrong, the entire system wanders off at a tangent and whole generations are taught the wrong thing.