It truly beggars belief that someone can trust an unlicenced amateur radar tracking site that is notorious for its inaccuracy...
Does it also truly beggar your belief that:
- All cabin crew were assessed as unfit to continue duties.
- The Captain, whether PF or PNF, reportedly apologised on the PA for the landing. Yet BA reportedly declared a 'normal landing'.
- The Captain reportedly blamed the wind, yet another source reports that the wind was light and virtually constant.
- There are no reports of a heavy landing check. So what was the Captain apologising for?
- There are no reports of an MOR being filed.
- There are no reports that the CAA have been involved.
...and a group of militant cabin crew and then accuse the entire pilot community, CAA, FOQA, the passengers involved and BA management of closing ranks.
- Where is the basis of your suspicion that 'a group of militant cabin crew' exist? How does such a group form when it is composed of individuals who are extremely unlikely to work together as precisely that same group on anything other than very rare occasions, if ever?
- Where is it published that anyone is 'accusing the entire pilot community' of anything?
- Where is it published that anyone is 'accusing the CAA' of anything?
- Where is it published that anyone is 'accusing FOQA' of anything?
- Where is it published that anyone is 'accusing the passengers involved' of anything?
Are 'BA management closing ranks'? Do you have proof whether they are? Does that possibility
'beggar belief'?