This is always a discussion which causes me to chortle.
Why wouldn't the FAA want a BFR to fly an N reg aircraft, in US airspace with an American licence? The whole 61.75 system is a bonus in my opinion, yet too many people view it as a right. Perhaps scared of seeing an examiner due complete lack of FAR knowledge despite purporting to hold an FAA licence.
It hasn't happened here yet but normally someone will be along soon to decry the nasty FAA for such an inconvenience.
If I relied on a 61.75 to fly I would be starting to think about getting a stand alone licence. EASA seem determined to force their will on those FAA licensed pilots over here. I can't see the FAA not reciprocating in some form unfortunately. And it really is easier, after the initial issue.
Last edited by silverknapper; 13th May 2014 at 22:45.