As far as I can see, if they were to throw out the April 8th receptions, that changes nothing. It seems to me that they have just raised the bar for the type of data they will accept as the bedrock of their search assumptions.
They still appear to be certain that they have received pings from the dying ULB. For us (with only third hand data) to be second guessing these technical experts at their own game seems nonsensical to me.
This reminds me of those who wanted to question the Inmarsat engineers' technical reasoning, which I found laughable.
I do believe there are people from Malaysia who are withholding and possibly misstating information, but I don't question the experts and engineers at their own area of expertise.
Last edited by Propduffer; 13th May 2014 at 01:00.