i am consistently annoyed at the condescending drivel lambasting reporters and eyewitnesses trying to make sense of aviation emergencies. It is one of the least endearing characteristics of some alleged pilots.
The issue is why is it published. The reason for the lambasting is the appalling inaccuracy of what is published as fact.
For example in this particular case there is a huge difference between a rejected take-off and a aircraft rotating then putting the nose on the runway and stopping as was reported earlier today.