that should only happen once all roads are constructed or existing roads widened, new rail lines are completed
I hope they don't complete all roads & rail spurs prior to commencing the airport proper. Imagine all that expensive infrastructure lying vacant for the five plus years it takes to build terminals and runways. Would be like completing a car park before starting to build the adjacent mall. (Appropriate analogy I think, if Macquarie end up doing the building!)
So anyway, I wonder if anyone can see the irony here? Bunch of people criticising the best researched option on the table, continuing to flog the dead horse that is SYD, or "we just need to use [insert favourite NSW airport here]", round and round on the same circle of under-informed opinions. Sounds exactly like what the pollies have been doing for thirty years!
I think, good on Tony for actually reaching a conclusion. +1 for that!