Originally Posted by
CONF iture
Sorry but there is ample way to do it professionally ... or you can always choose to do it unprofessionally.
Given that we've established that the tools to generate and annotate the material digitally were not readily available in 1990, how would you propose they do it differently?
Tell me ... is it that same sort of copying machine that swallowed Annexe VII ?
Annexe VII is there. It was either mis-labelled by the clerk who compiled the paper copy, or the sheet inserted by the clerk who did the original compilation made a mistake in describing it. What the document scanning hopper *has* done is get the occasional pages scanned in the wrong orientation, but they do all appear to be present.
The way to check this would be to go and have a look at the original paper copy in the Republic archives, but I wouldn't know how to go about doing that (and as a foreign citizen may not be able to access it anyway).