Posting a single sentence of a multiple exchange of PM's is a Mortal Sin here at Rotorheads as I recall too.
You care to post the entire exchange we had on the Twin v Single thing and let everyone see all of what was said and not just the one sentence that plainly was taken completely out of context of the multiple message discussion?
i am not the only one that pokes sticks at the CAA, FAA, and the other various authorities.
Show me where I endorsed flying VMC without adequate visual clues.
You do recall I have criticized the FAA for their wording of Part 91 Night Visibility Rules that do not require Private Operations to have adequate surface light reference as they do in Part 135.
I did not denigrate the Rule but asked how we arrived at them.
It would appear you have a problem with folks challenging the Rule Makers to justify their actions.
The North Sea Review is full of criticism of the CAA by Brits. Why no angst with them?
One is supposed to play the Ball here Jim perhaps you might do that.