PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - NOTAM - Please Help
View Single Post
Old 25th Apr 2003, 18:24
  #13 (permalink)  
Mike Cross
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Savannah GA & Portsmouth UK
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for that Tinstaafl

You can find out how the 4000 ft filtering works here

Basically on a Narrow Route brief from departure a/d to first waypoint and from last waypoint to arrival a/d you get everything from surface to FL120. For the remainder of the route you get +/- 4000 ft from the entered FL.

If you can't get what you want by manipulating the waypoints you will need to use the Route Briefing, which enables you to set upper and lower FL's but will give you the entire FIR.

As mere pilots we are not allowed to see the raw data from which the briefings are derived. However if you go to the US Department of Defense NOTAM site and select Text Type "Raw" and put EGTT in as the ICAO identifier you will get the raw data, for example:-

B0172/03 NOTAMN
Q) EGTT/QAZCD/IV/NBO/E/000/020/5113N00136W005
A) EGTT
B) 0304190800
C) 0304271600
D) APR 19 20 AND 27 0800-1600
E) THRUXTON ATZ CLOSED DUE AD UNLICENCED

In the line starting Q) (the famous "Q Line") 000/020 is the effective height band as FL (sfc to 2000 ft)

Also locked in there is all sorts of information that would allow programs like NotamPlot and NotamPro to be really effective. You can find a Q Line decode here

We're still lobbying to get this info released. NATS/AIS have no objection it's the CAA who are delaying a decision.

Browser compatibility is a priority. As you will appreciate this is commercial third party software. Some of the site functionality is dependent on features that are supported by IE5 and Communicator 4.7 or later with JavaScript and Cookies but not by other browsers. It's therefore not possible to cut out the offending code without crippling the site. An independent survey of browser usage can be found here the figures indicate that around 95.5% of page accesses are made using browsers supported by the AIS site. AIS are exploring methods of improving this percentage.

24 Hrs seems to be the consensus for validity

Mike
Mike Cross is offline