I see the Company NOTAM has been reviewed and now states that the reason for not complying should be written on the VR. Either the feedback worked or the mountain of CSRs that needed processing caused a rethink. Why don't the people who write these things think a bit before publishing them.
If a trainer makes more than four mistakes in a year with the extremely user unfriendly OGS he gets assigned a day long report writing course for his sins. What happens to the people who put out this garbage and have to subsequently retract or amend it?
No answer required it was a rhetorical question.