Court Martialed for making a Command decision - I do not think so in British Military Aviation! Utter cobblers. Sorry.
I am not in a blame culture. Just a learning culture.
Then learn from some of us who worked under the regime.
Look at the comments made by the Air Rank officer who ran rough-shod over the findings of the BOI for the Mull accident. They could not positively determine the cause(s), and could not therefore put blame on the crew. The Air Rank officer, during the Lord's Inquiry, made a point of trying to belittle the President of the BOI, calling him "A relatively junior officer" (he was in fact of the usual rank/status for the job and now runs the RAF, btw).
Think why the crew were ordered to fly in an un-airworthy aircraft in the first place, despite the request of the captain.....
The introduction of the Mk2 was a compete c**k up; the department responsible for test flying it prior to it's introduction to service ceased flying theirs the day before because they thought it unsafe to continue, even in controlled test flying conditions. The "Mull" crew was made to "fly the flag" for political and /or career saving reasons against the request of the captain and it resulted in the tragic deaths of all on board.
Don't try to tell us there was no pressure from on high in British Military Aviation!
FYI, There
was a court martial of an aircraft captain following events in the FI, after a higher command decision was disputed. Without going into great detail, crews could see the enemy air threat and could see that they needed to to fly their aircraft off ship to a dispersed location on shore asap. They were not allowed to, for reasons never made clear. This decision was challenged and one aircraft captain was formally disciplined by CM for doing so. The fact that the majority of the SH force went to the bottom of the sea shortly afterwards, indicated that the request was correct and reasonable.