How about bringing some decent psychological evidence into play?
I doubt it would do you any good.
First of all psychologists know nothing about flying, secondly they are notoriously wrong about many things that involve human mind. Third, they typically deal in generalities.
I beg to differ. I'd bet money that there are at least a few forensic psychologists in mix, looking at everything from the crews to radar crews, to passengers and ground crews, trying to assess the probability of action (or inaction) on the parts of any of these people. I'd sure want their best guess as part of my data stream.