PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - E-3 REPLACEMENT
Thread: E-3 REPLACEMENT
View Single Post
Old 27th Mar 2014, 18:05
  #16 (permalink)  
Sentry Agitator
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Lincoln
Age: 54
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Multi-msn (E-10): was considered and discounted by the US a few years back with costs, integration, different operating characteristics, system fusion and most importantly COST being the driver for the block40/45 E-3G upgrade and P-8 Poseidon procurement.

RPAS: available bandwidth for comms and data relay likely to be the biggest hurdle. Perhaps the great great grandson of 5G may be a potential answer.

Dirigible: may offer greater persistence but manned or unmanned with bandwidth for unmanned yet again needing to be considered.

Smaller platform = smaller crew = potentially more limited capabilities ie smaller sensors suite with more limited range.

Satellites: geosynchronous offers persistence & wide field of regard at massive cost. Sensors with bandwidth for data/comms and counter satellite capabilities are very big questions?

Upgrade: current production line in place (for sister fleets) and most likely to be the most cost effective solution (in near term) with probable life extension beyond OOS date.

Different variant: reopening production lines (E767) won't be cheap.

Cost vs need vs another capability 'vacation'?
Sentry Agitator is offline