Originally Posted by Chris Scott
Another curious aspect of this matter is that an HTML version of the BEA report -
Habsheim F-GFKC - clearly shows a figure of 24 ft in both Tomes 1 and 2.
Well, that's the risk you take with an unofficial publication. That document was probably
derived from the BEA PDF, and transcribing those DFDR printouts must have been especially error-prone. I'd say that the evidence offered by CONF iture (the magnified scans, and the values as they appear in the narrative) is sufficiently convincing.